The Model G Vortical Motion Group comprises of a group of scientists working on a Subquantum Kinetics/Model G project. We aim to represent particle spin magnetic moment by simulating ether vortex currents in a subquantum reaction-diffusion ether which is hypothesized to form the substrate for a subatomic particle.  We work with a system called Model G which mathematically represents reaction-diffusion processes taking place in a space-filling ether.  This approach follows a format similar to that of the Brusselator, but which is applied to microphysics rather than to chemistry.


Subquantum kinetics (SQK) is a methodology that applies general systems concepts to microphysics. We are attempting to simulate in two and three dimensions an open nonlinear reaction-diffusion system called Model G, that has been shown to spawn particle like structures (dissipative solitons), which exhibit characteristics similar to subatomic particles. Type X and Y etherons describe the electric field component, whose spatial displacement in terms of vortices produces the magnetic phenomena, and type G etherons describe the gravity field. Our main goal is to simulate and model vortical motion of the ether substrates making up a subatomic particle, and hence demonstrate the fundamental property of magnetism. Also, particle collision, deBroglie diffraction and soliton quantum tunnelling are other areas we investigate.

SQK theorizes that an ether vortex would develop in the particle’s core and that this produces what physicists refer to as particle spin magnetic moment. Achieving this would make Model G (i.e. SQK) more physically realistic, thus upgrading it and allowing it to describe science and technologies at quantum level. At present, physics has no official conceptual model of what spin is, it just assumes it as a property of subatomic particles. SQK goes further to explain the details of how spin forms.

SQK conceives the electric field potential (ether concentration gradient) and magnetic field (ether vortex currents) as being seated in the ether as opposed to being attached to the field sources that generate them. SQK provides a framework for understanding the functioning of technologies that can tap into the ether and create energy that is clean and very cheap! It therefore provides a new paradigm for physics, one where over-unity energy generation becomes possible.













                            Fig. Spherically-symmetric 3D stationary particle in 1D. This video
                            simulates Model G's open reaction-diffusion system of X, Y and
                        G substrates forming a neutral subatomic particle. This simulation
                                       does not include vortical motion of the substrates.

We have a stackexchange wiki page linked below, where you can ask questions and receive answers, from our community on subquantum kinetics and Model G:
https://stackoverflow.com/c/model-g-vortical-motion-group-wiki

Active group members:
Dr. Paul A. LaViolette - Founder of The Starburst Foundation passed away on 19th Dec. 2022
Dr. Brendan J. Darrer - CEO and Treasurer of The Starburst Foundation and Ph.D. in Physics (classical electromagnetism and tomography), email: brendan.darrer.12@alumni.ucl.ac.uk
Bob Gray
Dr. Justin Coven - Ph.D. in Computer Science
Solomon Appavoo - 5th year Ph.D. candidate in organic chemistry at the
University of Toronto
Chris M. Sciacchitano - pursuing an associates degree in physics and President of the physics club at Suffolk Community College
Prof. Theo Almeida-Murphy - Vice-President of The Starburst Foundation
Thomas Chavez - Secretary of The Starburst Foundation

Websites of members:
https://starburstfound.org/
https://etheric.com/
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul-Laviolette
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brendan-Darrer
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Theo-Almeida-Murphy
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chris-Sciacchitano


Book reviews, videos and predictions of Subquantum Kinetics:
https://etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/SQK-review.html
https://etheric.com/ether-physics/
https://starburstfound.org/predictions-part-2/

Main text: Subquantum Kinetics - a systems approach to physics and cosmology
available @ https://etheric.com/product/subquantum-kinetics-4th-edition-ebook/

Also see: @
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342393172_EXPLANATION_OF_MODEL_G_IN_SUBQUANTUM_KINETICS


N.B. A note about hidden variables in relation to subquantum kinetics

From SQK[1], p. 27:

“As a first step towards freeing itself from its current closed system paradigm, physics would need to acknowledge the possible existence of unobservable subquantum processes, or hidden variables, that might collectively produce observable quantum level phenomena. This direction of thought, however, has encountered resistance in the physics community due to an unconscious acceptance or adherence to the materialist philosophy of logical positivism which holds that only those things that we are able to directly detect through measurement have any real existence. Since it is not possible to directly detect an ether or subquantum processes possibly taking place in an ether, there is a tendency to totally deny the possibility that such might exist, even in view of experimental evidence which demonstrates that the Earth is moving relative to a preferred frame of reference; see Section 1.3.”

p. 326[1]:

“In the context of subquantum kinetics, superluminal speeds of entanglement are not the strange anomaly that they are in standard physics theory. As we have seen above, the speed restriction that applies to the propagation of transverse electromagnetic wave quanta through the ether does not apply to propagation of longitudinal wave shocks. Bell’s theorem tells us that no theory explaining quantum phenomena in terms of local hidden variables can account for distant entanglement. But subquantum kinetics does not have the problems of a local hidden variable theory: it allows phenomena at remote locations to communicate effects to a target location at superluminal speeds—etherons can diffuse or convect through space at speeds greater than c. The same is true for the speed at which spin vortices communicate their orientations to distant partner spin vortices.”

“It is now known that deBroglie’s indeterminate causality interpretation was closer to the truth than the acausal indeterminacy concept of the Copenhagen school. An experiment conducted by Dewdney, et al.(46) have shown that the position of a particle may be determined in a real sense prior to its deBroglie scattering event. As a result, in this particular case one must conclude that the wave-packet-collapse concept is seriously flawed. Their findings are supported by the results of another experiment subsequently carried out by a research team at the Center for Quantum Information which involved sending a series of solitary photon quanta through a two-slit interference grating.(47) The researchers found a way of determining the average direction in which the photons approached the slits prior to their passage through the slits, hence by carrying out a repeated series of observations they were able to determine in advance the average trajectory of the photons. The team conclude that their results support the Bohm and deBroglie interpretation of quantum mechanics over the conventional complementarity interpretation of Bohr which claims that the particle cannot behave as both a particle and wave simultaneously. Both experiments also support the subquantum kinetics[…]”[1]

[1] Excerpt From: Paul A. LaViolette. “Subquantum Kinetics: A Systems Approach to Physics and Cosmology.” iBooks.